Showing posts with label Mont Pelerin Society. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mont Pelerin Society. Show all posts

Friday, February 18, 2011

MPS Asia Regional Meeting-Three


I will cover the first session on February 11, 2011. You can see the speakers paper here.

The First Session on Inclusive Growth: The Unfinished Road to Reforms was chaired by Mr Suman K Bery, Director General, NCAER, New Delhi. He did not talking anything interesting (at least to me). This is one peculiar nature of talk often one can hear from any Indian economists!

Professor Amir Ullah Khan talked about the Liberalisation of the Informal Sector. The talk was more or less as usual that the reforms process has not been able to touch the informal sector where the majority of working age population is engaged in India. Much of this working age group population is directly shifted from agriculture without any marketable skills. But this story is off filled with not pure water but of bathwater!!

However, I asked him, have you ever come crossed any study which has looked the factors like informal sector influences with political groups and government machinery vis-à-vis the incentive mechanisms that operate between these groups on various aspects. His answer, as I hunched, was a big NO.

The issues related to Politics of Growth: Constraints and Opportunities were addressed by Mr.N K Singh, who is a Member of Parliament (RS). Instead of giving the reality of the politics in today’s India he kept himself focusing on the populist polices to convince the audience that the politics of growth is on right track!! He also seems to be not clear about what is all about functional democracy. All the major areas in which he had stressed was macro view. However, there was few crossing reference for useful reforms that is appreciable.

According to him the issue of income inequality is more of methodological and distributive matters rather than the usual assumptions.

Mr Surjit S Bhalla discussed about the Delivering on Promises: Public Private Partnerships, UID, and Social Entrepreneurship. As one often read his works, it is not surprise when he says that “India is a great path of testing liberal values” at this juncture.

He also agreed that India’s economic growth is taking place despite of the government and not because of the government. But in China, the economic growth is because of the State, and not despite of the State. Moreover, the economic freedom have delivered what is suppose to be rather than often claimed notion that the political freedom actually delivered the fruits of economic growth.

He gave very interesting analysis of income inequality as experienced in India and elsewhere.

What was quite disturbing to hear from his talk was the applauding for Bihar’s Chief Minister Policy to promote girls education by giving bicycles. This has been done through the direct cash transfer to the child or parents instead to buy the cycles and distribute to them as done in Tamil Nadu and other southern states some years ago. This is absolutely mockery the cycle as an incentive has not held to girls for enrolling in higher education that did not happened in Tamil Nadu and probably will not happen in Bihar. But we have to wait and see where the bucks stop!! 

Earlier posts: 1 2

Thursday, February 17, 2011

MPS Asia Regional Meeting-Two


Let me give you some sort of mixed picture from what I have noted from the various talks given by economists and experts in the MPS meeting on the opening dinner (Feb 10th, 2011).

Dr.Parth J Shah gave introduction with few facts about the CCS’s success stories such as its campaign (BAMBOO IS NOT A TREE!) against bamboo as a tree instead a grass, school choice campaign (education voucher or 25 percent reimbursement by Government) etc. He also mentioned that this is the second meeting organized in India.

He also mentioned that the amendments in the Shop and Establishment Act by the Government of Haryana paved a major window of opportunity to open call centres in India. Haryana was the first State in India to reform the above Act.

Professor Deepak Lal, who was immediate past President of MPS, gave Welcome Address. What was interesting from his address was that unfortunately the MPS society is divided when it comes to the debate of foreign polices!! He also said that this Society is not addressing the issues raised in the context of foreign polices.

The present President of MPS is Professor Kenneth Robert Minogu and he gave President Address. Few points from his address: (i) one point we should not be too taken by media that India, the global power, it is dangerous to think this and the State, (ii) he talked about the Prof F A Hayek’s works on the false government aims , promotion of welfare with debts, and (iii) the universal orders or spontaneous orders.

The MPS Asia Regional Meeting’s Inaugural Address (Full Paper in PDF) was given by Shri. Arun Shouri. Some major points from my noting: (i) India’s economic growth story is taking place despite of the government and not because of government has claimed to be, (ii) the former prime minister of India who initiated the economic reform in 1990s was the “honest crook”!!!, (iii) please do not go by your vision, please do not go with their past record, (iv) the Hayek’s notion of liberalism, (v) all political parties in India run by people who believe in nothing, (vi) the Indian family values for care each other which is actually the driving force for growing economy, (vii) morality is public life, (viii) the welfare polices are being promoted, despite of its weakness, with the blessings of people like Amartya Sen, (ix) natural order of society, virtual foundation of society, (x) a dog with a bone is his mouth cannot park.

Raj Cherubal had asked the important question which people like us ponder: what would the answer of Professor F A Hayek if he is alive in the mid’s of today’s crisis in India and abroad?

Mr Shouri answered rightly that the development and growth is taking place in a particular society not because of government but despite of it. But one can easily argue that Mr.Shouri is biased.

Previous posts: 1